My
Comment:
1.
Bhaja
govindam; bhaja govindam
Govindam bhaja
moodhamate;
Samprapte
sannihite kale;
Nahi,
nahi rakshati; Dukrinj karane.
2.
Moodha
jahihi dhanagama trishnam;
Kuru
satbudhim manasi vitrushnam;
Ladlabhase nija karmopatham
Vitham thena;
Vinodaya chitham.
3.
Naree
sthanabhara nabhee desam;
Drushtva ma ga mohavesm;
Ethad
mamsa vasadi vikaram;
Manasi
vichinthaya varam, varam.
4.
Nalinee
dalagata jalamati tharalam;
Thadvad
jeevithamatisaya chapalam;
Vidhi vyadhya
bhimana grastham;
Lokam
sokahatham cha samastham.
5.
Yavadvithoparjana
saktah:
Thavad
nija parivaro rakta:
Pashchad
jeevati jarjara dehe;
Vartham
kopi Na prischati gehe.
6.
Yavad
pavano nivasati dehe;
Thavad
prishchati kusalam gehe;
Gatavati vayou
dehapaya;
bharya
bibhyati thasmin Kaye.
7.
Balsthavad
kreedasakta:
Tharunasthavad
tharunee saktah:
Vridhasthavad
chintasaktah:
Pare
brahmani kopi na sakta:
8.
Ka
the kanta kaste putra:
Samsaroyamative
vichitra:
Kasya
thvam va kuta aayatha:
Thathvam
chintaya thadiham bratha:
9.
Satsangatve
nissangatvam;
Nissangatve
nirmohatvam;
Nirmohatve nishchintatvam;
Nishchintatve
jeevan mukti:
10.
Vayasi
gate ka: kamavikara:
Shushke
neere ka: kasara:
Ksheene
vithe ka: parivara:
Jnathe
tatve ka: samsara:
11.
Ma
kuru dhana jana youvana garvam;
Harati nimeshad
kalassarvam;
Mayamayamidamakhilam hitva; Brahmapadam tvam pravisha
viditva.
12.
Dinayaminouw
sayam prata: Shishira
vasanthouw punarayata: Kala kreedati
gachatyayu: thadapi munjatyaasha vâyu:
There
are too many legends on Adi Shankara and here is one of them. During his
travels and preaching’s he came to Kasi or Varanasi on the banks of river
Ganga. This ancient city is too famous for learning and scholars. All subjects
are debated here. Shankara saw the scholars engrossed in the professional
subjects. He met on of them a grammarian. He was upset and these poetic verses
came out of involuntary outpourings. They are in twelve in number. The annotators
and commentators found in these verses profound wisdom and the essence of the
teachings of the vedantic philosophy.
1)
The
acharya addresses the scholar “Hi. You idiotic mind.” I feel that it is
unbecoming of a guru to address a scholar in this word, a word derogatory and
abusive. What is that being conveyed? “The grammatical knowledge will not
protect you when the time of death approaches nearer.” Does it mean that there
is a way to avoid approaching death? There will be no answer.
2)
The
next verse is not continuity from earlier one. It says: “Ye fool, reject the
greed to acquire wealth (money) cultivate your mind with good thoughts away
from greed. Whatever you get for your work (labor) make merry within that
amount (wealth).” This seems to be a most idealistic position possible. However,
it has too many problems to address. One of them is the measure of the value of
one’s labor. There are two carpenters say A and B. A is talented and makes one
chair a day. One chair is worth one day’s labor. He makes three chairs in three
days. B could make only one chair in three days. What is his labor worth? Could
it be compared with the value of labor of A? I was thinking and thinking and
was unable to reconcile the two. Thus it proves that reality is completely
different than an ideal.
3)
The
next message has nothing connecting the earlier. It says that “don’t be seized
with high infatuation, when you see the high milky busts of a female and her
naval region that goes down to the vagina. They are the evolved form of meat
and fat. So think again and again.” This looks as one despicable tending to
abusive of the female body form. Not just the form but female as such. With
their natural voluptuous curves, they entice men from being pious and devoted
to God Govinda. It means that men are to be liberated from female sexuality so
that they turn towards Brahman and escape from birth death cycle. But what is
to happen to female since they are half the human kind? No answer. If and when
the man rejects the female half from his life then at least the humans of the
world will get extinguished like some earlier beings such as dinesores from the
face of earth. It will be the greatest boon to nature; already polluted by the
innumerable humans.
It
reminds the characterization of the female as all powerful according to another
composition “Soundarya Lahari” by the same author. The first verse in this
praises the female deity as all powerful in whose absence the male Shiva is
absolutely immobile. The man cannot praise her or prostrate before her unless
he has accumulated lot of good deeds (devotion) in life.
Her
power is illustrated in 13th verse in this composition. It is
absolutely derogative to all females. It
reads like this: “When your (goddess’s) side glances falls upon an old decrepit
and idiot of a man; hundreds of young ladies run after him, with tresses unknotted,
their bust coverings blown away, their jingling metal belts broken and all
clothes slipping (stark naked).” What a degrading description? Is this a
devotional poem? Yes; no commentator in my view did criticise this anywhere.
Power of all powerful goddess indeed!! While her glances fell on an old man she
did not see the running naked lasses. A tragic position!! There is no need to
speculate on anything here. They are so clear. Females as a whole is pictured
here as being lusty and sluts in turn.
4)
The
next is not connected with earlier. It says that “like water lolling in a lotus
leaf; the life is very much versatile. Understand; that the world is infected
with severe deceases and gripped with egoism and therefore the whole world is
in dead grief.” There is no need to comment on this except that the world is
supposed to have created by the all powerful god itself.
5)
Some
follow up here on. “As long as one is engaged in earning wealth; he is cared by
his own family but when he is old and wrinkled, no one at home ask about him.”
6)
The
next follows: “As long as breathing remains in body; people around ask about
his wellbeing (this is in complete
contravention of the earlier). When the last breath leaves the body dead;
his wife (who was always with him
sleeping with him all nights in past) fears this body.” We all see such situations and accept this
fact.
7)
“One
is engrossed in play while a child (a natural act); on attaining the age of youth
one is interested in young damsels and when one gets old, immersed in worries
(for not completing tasks or not attaining desired results and so on). The
first two are very much natural and the third is partially so). The last one
laments the living for not getting interested in the ultimate Brahman. A sad
future to the world!! The teacher wants us not to follow the natural course but
contemplate on extra or supra natural Brahman of whose existence we have no
proof. That is it.
8)
Next
is a kind of philosophical question. Hi, brother, think of the truth that this
worldly is so much surprising that questions remain; who is your wife; who is
your son; of whose are you and where from you came. If it concerns present the
questions could be answered as truthfully as possible. Going deeper into the
matter we come across questions that could not be answered by us. The reference
is to the Riigvedic Suktam “Nasadiya Suktam” (Rv. X. 129. 6 & 7). The seer
is speculating about emergence of something from nothing and not satisfied. He
says that:
“But, after all, who knows, and who can say whence it all came, and how creation
happened? The gods themselves are later than
creation, so who knows truly whence it has arisen?” //6//
(Here
Gods mentioned are Rigvedic like Indra, Agni, Varuna, Vayu, Maruts and others.)
“Whence all creation had its origin, whether he fashioned it or whether he didnot, he, who surveys it all
from highest heaven, he knows - or maybe even he does not know.”
//7//
So
the ultimate is; nobody knows or could know.
9)
Here
is another riddle; spiritual or otherwise. “When one is associated with groups of
pious; then slowly gets disconnected and when thus disconnected; one loses the
need of desires; on losing desires one gets inactive and there after attains
salvation in life.” Do all these mean that one should get to state of
inactivity before death? Or death comes after salvation or before? What is the
sign of such a stage?
10)
Again
next. “ What is sexual emotion when one is past his youth; what is a pond from
which water dried up; what to do with family when one is short of wealth and
what is worldly when truth is known?”
Let
us look at these a little closer. What is age when youth is passed? Is there
any uniformity; say 40, 50, 60 and so on? Though aged men feel young as long as
their mental faculty is functioning. It is true the sexual abilities remain for
long in some as long as 90 and more. So the first statement is partially true.
The second is true. Third is also not fully true depending on given circumstances.
The last could not be perceived except with those contemplate on it.
The
entire above are too exaggerated statements to impress the disciples. Nobody in
history took them seriously enough to follow them. There is no need to
elaborate.
11)
“Do
not feel too proud about your wealth, people around and young age. Time will
snatch them all within seconds and so leave all these as Maya i.e. unreal and
then enter the abode of the Brahman.” These bring more questions than those
stated. Who says that all is unreal and wherefrom he got this revelation? Yes;
it is all from this world whose picture he has formed in his mind. Are they not
unreal coming from an unreal world or mind? So the unreal come out of another
unreal!! That is real. Could it be that the one pointing the unreality of is real
or Maya? Would one conclude that some are real while others are unreal? Many
more questions are waiting but let this be short.
12)
After so many homilies follow his path to
Brahman the teacher is frustrated and blames everything on desires. “While the
life is ebbing; time plays its changes repeatedly; from days to nights;
evenings to mornings; winters to springs and even then one does not get rid of
his storming desires.” It looks like that there no use in exhorting people to
go on chanting the name of Govinda. Still chanting goes on mostly in groups. No
one thinks about the meanings and their relevance to time. Here one remembers
the late Kanchi Periyaval Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswathy; maintains that
chanting is all that is important and not its meanings. According the melody
queen of the south M.S.Subbalaxmi rendered many these chanting including Bhaja
Govindam to music and was singing them and also made records of them. They are available
here and now.
The
entire tenor of this composition is anti female degrading them using venom and
hatred unprecedented. The all powerful female depicted in the first verse of
Soundarya Lahari is hypocritical and unsound.
One
needs to contrast this hate female composition with another namely Gita
Govindam. Both are regarded as highly devotional to God Govinda. The later is
being sung in many Vaishnava temples including the Jagannath Puri and Guruvayur
in Kerala. At the outset Jayadeva tells us that his composition is the
descriptions of sexual play indulged by the God Vasudeva Krishna. The author
has combined the two i.e. Bhakti (devotion) and Bhukti (imbibing pleasure and
happiness in worldly i.e ultimately sex).
Couple
of references could prove this. “One young mature cowherd lady went on singing
melodiously; after embracing Hari in lust with the weight of her heavy hard
busts.” Hari “embraces one, kissing one,
making love to one, looking at the smiling beautiful face of another and
follows still another.” (4th Ashtapadi-2 & 7) In her hurry to start the sexual play Radha
did something surprising; she mounted Krishna from top (viparita ratam), at the
end her midriff stood still. The delicate hands loosened their grip, her two
heavy busts heaved and eyes closed. How is that the women get the manly trait?
(Verse 82) These and many more explicit descriptions are presented everywhere
in this composition. All these show that both devotion and seeking sexual
satisfaction go hand in hand. In Gita Govindam is earthier in its contents than
just devotional. It celebrates the sexual union of mortals; though one of them
Devine.
Indian
or ancient Hindu tradition makes out that one should pursue the four worldly
goals namely Dharma (righteous path or living); Artha meaning seeking wealth
(righteous); Kama pleasure and happiness through sexual relations and Moksha
meaning salvation. All the four goals are not antithetic but harmonious to each
other and get adjusted in course of time. So seeking pleasures, wealth and lovely
sex are not ungodly and or unethical in our tradition. The ras leela of Krishna
and Gopies in Vrindavan is the ultimate tradition. However, today tradition is
so pulverized and twisted by people that we have forgotten the true tradition.
Even today the fanatical group of so called godmen and very many scholarly
persons consciously reject them and gloss over with modern scientific terms
like energy etc. Gita Govindam shows the
way. Let me rest with this.
K.N.Krishnan
No comments:
Post a Comment